A year of environmental policy: little to celebrate

05 August 2017

To mark President Kuczynski’s first year in office, the influential NGO, Cooperacción, looks back at a year of environmental policy-making and finds few reasons to celebrate. The core of the government’s approach to stimulating mining investment appears to be the reduction of standards and controls.
http://cooperaccion.org.pe/main/opinion/744-ppk-un-ano-desmantelando-politicas-ambientales

Cooperacción lists seven items of policy, or their absence. Four are instances of reduced levels of control or associated penalties (lower air or water standards, the reduced need for environmental studies in some circumstances, lesser penalties for illegal mining). Three more concern institutional roles of the Environment Ministry (Minam): its exclusion from territorial regulation and the management of reconstruction, and its replacement by the Economy and Finance Ministry (MEF) as the national authority relating to use of the UN Green Fund (the principal UN source funding work to mitigate climate change).

Following on from this review, Cooperacción posits that the whole approach is based on a complete misreading of what really deters investment in extractive industries. The real problems, as cited by Cooperacción and based on the Central Banks’s IV Mining Survey (Encuesta Minera) of December 2016, are international prices, corporate strategies, rising costs and maintenance problems – plus ‘social conflicts’ arising mostly from inadequate management of environmental and land issues.

The approach criticised here will be further strengthened by the failure last week to get any bids for the La Oroya smelter on the third time of asking. The Director of Dirige, the consulting firm charged with getting a contract under way, says investors are still worried by the lack of clarity on responsibility for remediation of past environmental damage
http://www.miningweekly.com/article/perus-la-oroya-smelter-faces-liquidation-after-failed-auctions-2017-07-26

All news

  • PSG Aims

    The Peru Support Group exists to promote social inclusion, sustainable development and the observance of human rights in Peru. To that end the PSG highlights shortcomings in observance of established norms, whether international or local in nature, in its research, advocacy and publications. In so doing, it underscores the relationships that exist within the political system, how institutions work, and the effectiveness of policies that aim to reduce poverty and inequality within the context of sustainable development.

  • Historical Overview

    Over the past century Peru has suffered a series of autocratic governments and a civil war in which nearly 70,000 people died. Many of the country's ongoing political and social problems are a legacy of its somewhat turbulent past. 

  • Human Rights

    Human rights violations were widespread during the twenty years after the initiation of armed conflict in 1980. Efforts to convict perpetrators since the war's end have made only limited progress. Today, concerns remain over the treatment of those engaged in social protest, particularly against strategically important investment projects.

  • Why join the PSG?

    • Keep up to date with latest news and developments in Peru
    • Learn about key issues of poverty, development and human rights in Peru
    • Support the work of the Peru Support Group

    Become a member