Organisations slam Culture Ministry over plans to define indigenous policy

26 October 2019

ONAMIAP (the organization representing indigenous women of the Amazon and Andes) and the CNA (representing highland peasant communities) have made trenchant criticisms of the initial procedures promoted by the Culture Ministry for consultation in elaborating a national policy for indigenous peoples. 

The ministry has proposed beginning with three macro-level regional workshops, one each in Lima, Cusco and Iquitos. It is the state agency responsible for promoting and defending the interests of indigenous peoples.

The organisations claim that the ministry has failed to produce the conceptual, legal and methodological frameworks required for the proposed national policy. They want workshops to be held in the central and northern regions of the country. They also say that the ministry has failed to disseminate the diagnostic report (undertaken by its specialists) which presents the technical and political arguments behind the need for a national policy.

Additionally, the organisations argue that ten years is too long a period for the policy and that the programme for its formulation is unnecessarily tight and pressured. There is no guarantee that the ministry will provide professional advice and expertise which otherwise the indigenous organisations would have to fund themselves.

Also, they say that the ministry has done little to encourage participation by the UN’s Working Group on Indigenous Populations. Finally, they say that the ministry has failed to include CUNARC, the national federation representing peasant self-defence organisations. CUNARC is currently the coordinator of the Indigenous Organisations Unity Pact.

The government has yet to institutionalise the free, prior and informed consultation of indigenous peoples and their representatives in state decision and policy making. This is in spite of Peru’s ratification of OIT Convention 169 25 years ago and passage of the required domestic legislation eight years back.

If the ministry is incapable of designing and implementing a smoothly functioning consultation process, there seems little hope that this right will be fully recognised and implemented by other state sectors.

All articles

  • PSG Aims

    The Peru Support Group exists to promote social inclusion, sustainable development and the observance of human rights in Peru. To that end the PSG highlights shortcomings in observance of established norms, whether international or local in nature, in its research, advocacy and publications. In so doing, it underscores the relationships that exist within the political system, how institutions work, and the effectiveness of policies that aim to reduce poverty and inequality within the context of sustainable development.

  • Historical Overview

    Over the past century Peru has suffered a series of autocratic governments and a civil war in which nearly 70,000 people died. Many of the country's ongoing political and social problems are a legacy of its somewhat turbulent past. 

  • Human Rights

    Human rights violations were widespread during the twenty years after the initiation of armed conflict in 1980. Efforts to convict perpetrators since the war's end have made only limited progress. Today, concerns remain over the treatment of those engaged in social protest, particularly against strategically important investment projects.

  • Why join the PSG?

    • Keep up to date with latest news and developments in Peru
    • Learn about key issues of poverty, development and human rights in Peru
    • Support the work of the Peru Support Group

    Become a member