Olaechea appointee rejected by Constitutional Tribunal

20 October 2019

The Constitutional Tribunal made a hugely significant decision on 17 October by refusing to acknowledge Gonzalo Ortiz de Zevallos as a member.

Ortiz de Zevallos’ name had been put forward by the former president of Congress, Pedro Olaechea, to replace Eloy Espinosa-Saldaña as a member of the seven-member tribunal. Not only was Ortiz de Zevallos Olaechea’s cousin but he was known to have close sympathies with the fujimorista cause.

In the event, and confounding expectations, only two members of the TC voted for Ortiz de Zevallos. 

Had he been elected to replace Espinosa-Saldaña, it would probably have tipped the balance in the TC towards the fujimoristas at a moment when the tribunal has, amongst other things, to rule on whether the dissolution of Congress was carried out in accordance with the constitution and on whether Keiko Fujimori’s detention defies her constitutional rights.

The TC’s task is to judge whether specific actions are in accordance with constitutional principles. As such, it plays a key role within the functioning of the state. Its members are supposedly chosen for their impartiality and their experience as jurists. They are not supposed to be influenced by political affinities or calculations.

Fears had built up in previous days that the president of the TC, Ernesto Blume Fortini, would use his casting vote to approve Ortiz de Zevallo’s nomination. In practice, however, his nomination by Olaechea was vitiated by voting irregularities in the Congress and by the fact that it was never published in the official gazette.

Now, with Congress suspended until January, it will not be possible to nominate new members to the TC, even though the majority of its members should have retired by now. They have to continue to fulfil their role as justices until such time as they are replaced

The existing TC will first have to consider the admissibility of the case brought by Olaechea about the legality of the dissolution of Congress. A hearing has been scheduled for 29 October. If deemed admissible, the TC would then have to adjudicate on whether it followed constitutional norms. In practice, it would prove difficult, and massively contentious, were the TC to rule that the dissolved Congress should be restored.

It will also have to rule on Keiko’s case. Failure to ratify Ortiz de Zevallos probably reduces the chances of Keiko walking free anytime soon.

All articles

  • PSG Aims

    The Peru Support Group exists to promote social inclusion, sustainable development and the observance of human rights in Peru. To that end the PSG highlights shortcomings in observance of established norms, whether international or local in nature, in its research, advocacy and publications. In so doing, it underscores the relationships that exist within the political system, how institutions work, and the effectiveness of policies that aim to reduce poverty and inequality within the context of sustainable development.

  • Historical Overview

    Over the past century Peru has suffered a series of autocratic governments and a civil war in which nearly 70,000 people died. Many of the country's ongoing political and social problems are a legacy of its somewhat turbulent past. 

  • Human Rights

    Human rights violations were widespread during the twenty years after the initiation of armed conflict in 1980. Efforts to convict perpetrators since the war's end have made only limited progress. Today, concerns remain over the treatment of those engaged in social protest, particularly against strategically important investment projects.

  • Why join the PSG?

    • Keep up to date with latest news and developments in Peru
    • Learn about key issues of poverty, development and human rights in Peru
    • Support the work of the Peru Support Group

    Become a member