Inter-American Court judges Peru on Fujimori pardon

3 February 2018

On February 2, the Inter-American Court on Human Rights (IACHR) convened a session in San José (Costa Rica) to consider the legality (or otherwise) of the pardon (indulto) extended by President Pedro Pablo Kuczynski last December to former president Alberto Fujimori. The proceedings were attended by lawyers for both the Peruvian government and those representing the victims of the La Cantuta and Barrios Altos killings. Representatives of the victims were also present.

The indulto has been widely questioned as to its international legality since crimes against humanity cannot be amnestied or pardoned. The Inter-American Commission, which is part of the Organization of American States (OAS), has argued that the pardon should be revoked.

If the IACHR upholds the illegality of the indulto it will pose a new and major problem for Kuczynski.

To accept it and send Fujimori back to jail would constitute a further humiliation for a president whose authority has been widely subverted for apparently using the indulto to save his own political skin from impeachment. It would also put at risk future support from Kenji Fujimori and his group in Congress - see PSG article.

To reject it would place Peru on a collision course with the IACHR and the system of region-wide Latin American jurisprudence. When Fujimori himself did this at the end of the 1990s, threatening to withdraw from the jurisdiction of the Court, it alienated international opinion, hastening his own political demise.

On the eve of the IACHR hearing, Amnesty International (AI) issued a statement describing the indulto as “a serious blow for human rights in the region and, in particular, to the victims and their families”. For its part, the Center for Justice and International Law (CEJIL) defined it as “arbitrary and contrary to Peru’s international legal obligations”

Justice Minister Enrique Mendoza said, following the hearing, that he could not imagine a scenario in which Fujimori would be returned to jail. “I would like to reiterate that the pressure [in the case] is emotional, personal and not based on argument. The arguments are weak, inexact or based on half-truths” he is quoted as saying. 

The Court announced that it will consider the case during the current period of sessions (which ends on 9 February) and issue its verdict “eventually”. Those familiar with Court proceedings say that this could mean a month or less.

All articles

  • PSG Aims

    The Peru Support Group exists to promote social inclusion, sustainable development and the observance of human rights in Peru. To that end the PSG highlights shortcomings in observance of established norms, whether international or local in nature, in its research, advocacy and publications. In so doing, it underscores the relationships that exist within the political system, how institutions work, and the effectiveness of policies that aim to reduce poverty and inequality within the context of sustainable development.

  • Historical Overview

    Over the past century Peru has suffered a series of autocratic governments and a civil war in which nearly 70,000 people died. Many of the country's ongoing political and social problems are a legacy of its somewhat turbulent past. 

  • Human Rights

    Human rights violations were widespread during the twenty years after the initiation of armed conflict in 1980. Efforts to convict perpetrators since the war's end have made only limited progress. Today, concerns remain over the treatment of those engaged in social protest, particularly against strategically important investment projects.

  • Why join the PSG?

    • Keep up to date with latest news and developments in Peru
    • Learn about key issues of poverty, development and human rights in Peru
    • Support the work of the Peru Support Group

    Become a member